Welcome


Greetings!

Thanks for visiting my vintage Hamilton watch blog. I like to restore US-made Hamilton wrist watches back to their original glory and share my experiences with other enthusiasts. Use the "Search" space below if you know what model you're looking for. Feel free to leave polite comments or questions in the spaces provided. Also check out my "watches for sale" on my Etsy site - the link is on the right, just below.

Sunday, July 9, 2017

1966 Lord Lancaster M

 - 600 - 

This is my 600th post to the blog.  Now that's a milestone worth celebrating and what better way to celebrate it than to feature an almost unheard of model?

There are 21 various Lord Lancaster models in the men's lineup.  There are even more if you throw in the ladies Lord Lancaster models.  I've only gotten to eight of them after close to 10 years of collecting.  So it's probably safe to say that many of the Lord Lancaster models are on the uncommon side.  But what makes them so rare?

One reason is they all feature diamonds in one way or another.  They say diamonds are a girl's best friend so it's possible diamonds featured on watches just didn't resonate with men.  After all, Hamiltons were expensive and would you rather have a manly dive watch like the 1966 Aqua Date Skindiver or a fancy pants diamond-laden timepiece with a two-tone suede strap?

Of course I'm being a bit facetious, as diamonds were included on lots of Hamilton models going back to the 1940's.  Diamonds make a special watch even more special.  But there were lots of other great models to choose from in the 1960s so that was probably a factor.

Another reason for rarity is total cost.  The finest watches were especially expensive.  In fact, several of the Lord Lancaster models didn't even list a price in the Hamilton catalog at all!  I suppose if you had to ask how much the watch was, you couldn't afford it.

One of the non-priced models is the 1966 Lord Lancaster M.  It was produced through 1969.


The Lord Lancaster M featured a 17 jewel movement but you might say it was a 57 jewel watch, as it had 40 diamonds surrounding the bezel.  The diamonds combine to a total of 1 carat weight!

The two-piece case is solid 14K white gold.

You might wonder what the Lord Lancaster M sold for.  I will tell you... I don't know.  The most expensive Lord Lancaster with a stated price was $400.  So if you assume it was more expensive than that, then you can at least make an educated guess.  $400 in 1966 is well north of $3,000 in today's dollars.

Now you have to be careful with a watch like the Lord Lancaster M.  It looks a lot like a "jeweler special" where a jeweler recased a Hamilton movement in an aftermarket case.  Often the cases are solid white gold or even platinum on occasion.  They are not authentic models and as such they are not desirable by knowledgeable collectors.  These franken-watches are mainly worth the scrap value of the materials they contain - which can still be significant.  However, on any given day you can find aftermarket jeweler-cased watches on eBay listed for ridiculously high buy it now prices.  Buyer beware, they are arguably worth $350-$400, tops.

With that in mind I was a bit incredulous when I saw a Lord Lancaster M listed for sale.  It wasn't in very good condition and I had my doubts about it's authenticity until I saw the inside of the properly-marked case back.  I put in a ridiculously high bid to make sure I wouldn't lose out to a last-second sniper.  Fortunately I wasn't competing with anyone with deeper pockets.

As received you can see that it was very dirty and the dial had a bit of a green funk growing around the perimeter.


The diamonds don't really sparkle thanks to all the grime but none of them are missing - so that's a good thing.


The back of the case is scratched up - not too deep but enough that the light reflects off it.  Perhaps this watch was engraved at some point?  The case back says Hamilton - that's something a jeweler cased model would not say.  All 40 of the holes for the diamond settings are filled with what I assume is the DNA of the previous owner.  Yuck.


The movement comes out once the snap-on back is removed.


This relatively large watch has a very small movement inside.  My photo is a bit blurry but you can see the outline of the movement recess.


This model uses a Hamilton 680, based on an ETA 2512.


Working on tiny movements like this presents a challenge that larger movements don't involve.  Although many of the parts are basically the same size, holding the movement steady is difficult.  You don't want to accidentally flip the movement and break the balance staff.  I have to use my smallest movement holder.


Just to give you a perspective of size, here's the 680 movement in it's holder relative to my larger Bergeon holder that I typically use.  The other holder looks huge by comparison.


The dial-side of the main plate is a classic ETA design.


Everything is cleaned and dried.  This looks like a straightforward movement when it's all laid out like this... way less complicated than a micro-rotor automatic, that's for sure.


Putting the four wheels of the train back in place is the first step for any ETA movement.  They should spin easily if everything is properly lined up.


Then the pallet fork and the mainspring barrel go on so I can wind the watch and re-energize it.


Once the balance is dropped into place the watch movement comes back to life.


Based on what I see from the timer, this movement is ready to roll.


It would be great to find a vintage two-tone suede strap like what would have originally come on the Lord Lancaster M but in the meantime a nice black genuine lizard strap will have to do.  Unfortunately I lost a little of the printing when I tried to remove the green funk on the dial.


But thanks to my friends Rob and Elizabeth Miller at International Dial Co, I've got a brand-spanking newly refinished dial to show off to you.  I've actually had this project waiting in the wings for a couple of months while I got the dial refinished.  The results were worth the wait, they nailed it.


Boy do those diamonds sparkle now.  I think this watch looks fantastic but don't expect to see it for sale.  I showed it to my bride and she said, "Is that for me?"... and you know how that story ends.

8 comments:

  1. Dan as always your post give me hours of entertainment and a lot of knowledge. My Hamilton collection is growing. I still have the Franken. A Neil, a Neilsen, 2 Nordons, a Secometer B and the Sea Mate II in vintage wristwatches. What I think is a 1925 974 pocket watch with the Safety Dial. A 38mm Khaki Field Automatic and a Khaki Field Officers Mechanical. I would say that I am firmly in the Hamilton camp now.
    One of my Nordons has been pressed into daily service as my work watch. I put a NATO strap on it and it has held up well in my warehouse job! This is my poor old experimental watch as you said you cringed when I told you I tried to take the crystal off with the claw.
    I have decided to put this one through the paces as it just keeps on winding and then you hear a little noise. But it does keep time and still runs. Is this a broken mainspring? By the way your suggestion about the loose movement on the Sea Mate II being a poorly fitting crystal was well founded as I replaced it and it seems to be staying in place.
    One other question. The Secometer had the second hand fall off. I pressed it on with a cheap hand press that I bought and it has not fell off yet. I also ordered a set of hand pressing tools that are in several sizes. As this being my first attempt in working with watch hands I did not know how much pressure to use. I have been wearing the Secometer around the house when I am home and the second hand has not fell off yet. So I guess I am learning. I also got a Bulova Clipper to use as a donor for my father's old 1953 Bulova he got for high school graduation. I guess I am making progress. Mostly because of the intel I am getting from your posts!
    I may at some time thin out my growing herd. Do you have any interest in any of these pieces if I decide to move a couple. The Bulova of course (I know the B word) I will keep because it was my father's.
    Thanks again!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If a manual winding watch winds ands winds and winds, it's because the mainspring is either broken or not attached to the barrel. A mainspring can break anywhere along its length and if it's near the inner coils the watch won't run long or at all. If it's on the outer coils then it will have enough friction to create wring tension for the watch to run... but not as long as a proper spring.

      Hands are fairly straightforward... too loose and they won't stay on and off if they're too tight they won't go on. It shouldn't require much pressure at all but they should stay put. Adjusting hands is a very basic watchmaking skill but not everyone has that skill or the tools required to do it.

      Delete
  2. 600!!! Wow now that's an amazing feat, congratulations. I just want to thank you for the hours of joy you have provided with the blog and the gentlemanly response to my many questions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's my please and all part of the fun of this hobby.

      Delete
  3. Congratulations Dan. It only seems like yesterday when you said you were thinking of setting a blog up. I've enjoyed every post!

    Kind Regards,

    Rich Harris.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Rich... yeah time flies. It's hard to believe I haven't run out of steam yet, although it is getting harder to land new models.

      Delete
  4. A search for cushion-shaped Hamiltons first brought me here Dan, and the quality of the work you do has kept me reading ever since. It's always a pleasure to see the watches you give new life to, and congratulations on the 600th post.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks! I'll try to keep it going. There are still a few cushion shaped models left to go.

      Delete